Add Your Heading Text Here

The four waves of shopping & agentic pricing

Dr. Fabian Uhrich - CPO Quicklizard | Pricing Expert | exBCG Partner | Business Angel Kathrin Schwan, Managing Director - Lead AI&Data Accenture DACH

Table of Contents

A humanoid robot explores agentic pricing on a digital screen, touching blue-lit holographic icons in a high-tech store.

Share:

The evolution of commerce has unfolded in four waves, each reshaping how pricing influences decisions. Today, as AI agents begin to act as autonomous shoppers, pricing becomes not just a number but part of a decision-making language that machines interpret alongside product features, reviews, and social sentiment. For CMOs, pricing leaders, and procurement executives, adapting pricing strategies for this fourth wave is instrumental.

The Four Waves of Commerce

1. Category-Browsing (since 1990s)

  • Dynamic: Consumers navigate digital shelves (catalogs, early e-commerce) in order to find what they need within the retailer’s shelf curation.
  • Pricing role: rather static, ensuring price architecture and consistency in order to guide the customer. Success relied on visible MSRP and simple discounting.
  • Quantitative impact: Online sales were <1% of retail in 2000; most prices were uniform. Main growth came from offline-online migration and internal cross- & upselling.
  • B2B vs. B2C: B2C focused on “good-better-best” tiers; B2B pricing was catalog-based or negotiated contracts.

2. Search-and-Filter (since 2010s)

  • Dynamic: Search engines, marketplaces, and filters increasing price transparency.
  • Pricing role: Competitive positioning became critical; dynamic pricing emerged. Revitalized by marketplaces extending shelf space to unlimited further fueling price competition.
  • Quantitative impact: By 2010, over 80% of online shoppers compared prices before buying. In B2B, >70% of procurement leaders reported price as the #1 decision criterion.
  • B2B vs. B2C: B2C leaned on price-match guarantees; B2B adopted e-procurement portals and RFQ digitization.

3. Social Shopping / Discovery Commerce (since 2020s)

  • Dynamic: Influence shifted to peers, creators, and reviews. A revival of teleshopping in a much more personalized way leading to a proliferation of D2C brands.
  • Pricing role: Less about cheapest price, more about perceived fairness and community endorsement. Lack of 1:1 comparability of D2C offerings raises the complexity of competitive pricing and requires mapping of “next best alternatives”.
  • Quantitative impact: 34% of consumers switched to a brand that made them “feel special” even at a higher price. Products with >4.5 stars commanded 20–30% higher willingness-to-pay.
  • B2B vs. B2C: B2C integrated referral discounts and influencer codes; B2B leaned on review platforms like G2 and Gartner Peer Insights to justify premium solutions.

4. AI-Agent Shopping (on the rise)

  • Dynamic: AI becomes the buyer. Agents compare price, specs, reviews, and availability autonomously and increasingly take the purchase decision
  • Pricing role: Data must be structured, transparent, and defensible. Agents optimize relentlessly for user-defined goals (e.g., lowest price under $50, best ROI in 12 months) feeding on their respective data contexts as well as custom memory settings and reasoning abilities. Focusing on top-sellers is not enough anymore – former long-tail products can suddenly spike in visibility and thus pricing diligence needs to cover the full catalogue.
  • Quantitative impact: 75% of consumers are open to using AI agents to shop on their behalf. One-third of enterprises already deploy agentic AI for procurement or workflow optimization.
  • B2B vs. B2C: B2C agents are expected to prioritize price+reviews; B2B procurement agents will demand real-time APIs for pricing, stock, and contract terms and – in addition to publicly available data – feed on bespoke company data products as well as on behind-the-paywall third-party data (e.g. from Price Reporting Agencies (PRAs) like FastMarkets, OPIS, ICIS).

Agentic Pricing Imperatives

Agents do not “see” banner ads or brand campaigns; they parse data. Pricing, therefore, must be presented in ways that AI systems can evaluate and trust. Key elements of this language:

1. Data Transparency

  • Execution: Publish real-time and well defined prices (incl. currency, unit size, and discounts) and inventory feeds in a structured and standardized way (e.g., referring to EAN codes, using APIs, schema.org, GS1). Provide APIs & ERP integration for procurement bots (B2B specific).
  • Why: AI agents ignore stale data. Accenture finds 70% of enterprises cite data readiness as the #1 barrier to scaling AI including Agentic AI.

2. AI Discoverability

  • Execution: Optimize for Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), not just SEO. Ensure description of key benefits, use cases, or comparable/substitutional products of your offering that help AI agents understand when to show your products according to user queries, purpose and intent. Encode ROI, durability, or sustainability leveraging specific industrial data models (e.g. GS1 for retail to consider specific attributes, e.g. country of origin/organic labels) into structured data so agents interpret worth, not just cost (especially in B2B context)
  • Why: 18% of consumers now rank Gen AI above search engines as a purchase advisor.

3. Price to Value

  • Execution: De-average pricing based on article roles – being price competitive on KVIs (Key Value Indicators) where you likely compete with other vendors pushing the same products versus focusing on value for the long-tail and encode differentiators (durability, ROI, sustainability) into product data where you show-up in agentic results not for price but because of value. Provide proof points (e.g., verified reviews, service-level agreements, sustainability metrics) that underline this value.
  • Why: In Accenture’s research, brands that embed responsible AI and trust signals see 18% higher AI-driven revenues. And by being more selective in where to focus on which competitor price, and where to stress value rather than price – a race to the bottom can be anticipated as proven by Sephora UK.

4. Price Transparency, Trust & Fairness

  • Execution: Use algorithms to adjust for pricing factors that are perceived as fair (e.g., demand, seller cost, country differences), but maintain transparent and explainable. Agents will discover and exploit potential price inconsistencies diminishing trust. Provide trust markers (e.g., transparent terms, consistent updates, zero hidden fees).
  • Why: 41% of consumers distrust AI-generated content that feels inauthentic; BCG study shows that certain pricing factors (e.g., demand, seller cost, country differences) increase price fairness whereas others decrease it (e.g., using private data, monopoly power). Unfair pricing will be flagged and filtered out by agents.
A robotic hand interacts with digital icons, highlighting secure agentic pricing and shopping in online transactions.

Recommendations for Practitioners

For Retailers, Distributors & Brands selling direct to consumer: from the perspective of a Head of Pricing, Category Management or D2C/eCom:

  • Expose structured data: Provide real-time APIs for product details (e.g., categorization, brand, EAN, units of measurement), stock status, delivery terms, and of course, price.
  • Publish verifiable quality metrics and trust markers: Include verified user ratings or other quality-assured test/review results.
  • Explain applicability & product fit: in case of non-comparable or private label products, provide information about next-best-alternatives to increase the likelihood of showing up in agentic recommendations.
  • Pick your battles: Understand your article roles and apply the right pricing strategy – knowing where to be competitive (KVIs) and where to focus on value (Profit Generators).
  • Get long-tail pricing right: it’s not enough to focus on top sellers anymore. GPT surfaces the long-tail and makes former niche products unpredictably spike in visibility and turn into focus. Ensure pricing hygiene in the long-tail leveraging improved automation.
  • Adjust prices dynamically: Constantly adjust prices for the latest cost information, competitor prices or stock levels since agentic shopping can happen instantaneously.
  • Ensure price consistency and fairness: Price inconsistencies (e.g., across channels) or differentiation (e.g., based on target audience) can become much more transparent through agents and harm trust and credibility.

For Intermediaries & Platforms such as idealo, scout-group from the perspective of a Head of Commercials acting…

  1. …as a Data Provider to enable Agentic Pricing Discovery for Agentic buyers
    • Expose structured, machine-readable, real-time feeds: Provide API-based price, stock, and spec data; agents ignore stale or unstructured info.
    • Optimize for GEO (Generative Engine Optimization): Use schema.org, GS1, or cXML to make offers machine-discoverable by AI.
    • Embed metadata & trust signals: Include currency, units, warranties, verified reviews, and transparent terms in all feeds.
    • Support B2C & B2B agents: Offer ERP-ready APIs for procurement bots and rich product data for consumer assistants.
    • Ensure data freshness & integrity: Use digital signatures and consistent updates to maintain agent trust.
  2. …as an Enabler to empower Sellers for AI-Driven Markets
    • Educate on AI-driven pricing: Help sellers understand agents rank on structured data—price, reviews&ratings, trust—not branding.
    • Provide dynamic yet fair pricing tools: Enable algorithmic repricing tied to demand and cost, with transparent logic, compliant to ESG-requirements and adhering to responsible AI guidelines.
    • Highlight value, not just price: Encourage sellers to encode ROI, quality, and sustainability as structured attributes, bundle experiential perks—exclusive access, loyalty points—that agents cannot commoditize.
    • Promote verified reviews & transparency: invest in review quality and volume, reward sellers maintaining accurate listings, no hidden fees, consistent data.
    • Facilitate B2B integration: Offer APIs and support outcome-based or usage-linked pricing visible to procurement agents.

For B2B: From the Perspective of a Product Manager….

  1.  … of industrial B2B Products (e.g. Elevators, Machinery)
    • Expose structured price–spec data: Provide real-time APIs for models, maintenance costs, uptime guarantees, and delivery terms.
    • Adopt interoperable standards: Use GS1 or cXML to let procurement bots compare equipment specs and SLAs seamlessly.
    • Shift to performance-linked pricing: Offer outcome models (e.g., pay-per-ride, pay-per-uptime) aligned with agent ROI optimization.
    • Publish verifiable quality metrics: Include certification, energy efficiency, and sustainability metadata for AI evaluation.
    • Enable dynamic yet fair pricing: Adjust by input costs or region transparently; document pricing logic for auditability.
    • Integrate with ERP systems: Ensure buyers’ procurement agents can fetch real-time stock, configuration, and quote data
    • Embed trust markers: Use digital signatures, verified service histories, watermarking, and transparent warranty data to rank higher with agents.
    • Test with AI-procurement pilots: In addition to internal agentic AI to simulate and pre-test buyer-agent behavior partner with key accounts procurement departments using agentic sourcing to validate discoverability and fairness.
  2. …of Digital Services & Software (e.g. Cloud Platforms, SaaS)
    • Offer real-time pricing APIs: Publish usage-based pricing, tier data, and contract terms in machine-readable JSON/XML.
    • Adopt schema.org & ISO taxonomies: Structure offer metadata (features, limits, SLA tiers) for agentic comparison engines.
    • Implement outcome-based models: Introduce pay-per-use or performance-based pricing that agents can map to user KPIs.
    • Expose trust & compliance signals: Include uptime stats, certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2), and verified user ratings.
    • Optimize for GEO: Make product and pricing data visible to generative engines powering AI procurement assistants.
    • Maintain algorithmic fairness: Keep dynamic pricing explainable—no opaque discounts or region-based bias.
    • Enable contract-ready integrations: Offer digital signing, SLA validation, and transparent billing APIs for autonomous agents.
    • Run sandbox tests: Simulate AI-buyer procurement journeys to ensure discoverability and agent-friendly pricing logic.

Conclusion

AI-agent shopping marks a structural shift. Pricing is no longer primarily a signal for people but a dataset for machines. Brands that adapt to the new reality —by exposing real-time, transparent, and value-rich pricing data—will remain visible in agent-driven ecosystems. Those that do not risk becoming invisible or commoditized.

The mandate for CMOs and pricing leaders: treat AI agents as a primary customer segment. Success will come from making pricing interoperable, discoverable, and anchored in value, ensuring both humans and machines recognize why the offer is worth its price.

Sources:

Quicklizard

https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/data-ai/front-runners-guide-scaling-ai

https://www.accenture.com/content/dam/accenture/final/accenture-com/document-3/Accenture-Me-My-Brand-and-AI.pdf

https://quicklizard.com/blog/sephora-case-study/

Share

You might also like:
When a KVI Isn't
Market Insights

When a KVI Isn’t

On Super Bowl Sunday a seventy five inch TV becomes a traffic driving KVI and by Monday it is a profit generator again, proving that segmentation should score the moment not the product and that static pricing models are where margin quietly leaks.

Read More »

Tariffs Are Paused. Use This Window to Build a Smarter Pricing Response. Learn How